Skip to main content

Gymea vs Kurrajong Hills

Property investment comparison - Gymea, NSW 2227 vs Kurrajong Hills, NSW 2758

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Gymea wins 4, Kurrajong Hills wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGymeaKurrajong Hills
Median house price$1.9M$1.9M
Median unit price$1.1M$2.0M
Gross rental yield (houses)3.07%-
Gross rental yield (units)3.75%-
1-year house growth-0.9%-0.9%estimate
3-year house growth+18.0%-
Vacancy rate0.9%7.6%
Population8,219705

Gymea vs Kurrajong Hills: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.9M in Gymea and $1.9M in Kurrajong Hills, so Gymea is the cheaper entry point, with Kurrajong Hills houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Gymea sits at a median of $1.1M against $2.0M in Kurrajong Hills, which makes Gymea the more affordable unit market and Kurrajong Hills the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved -0.9% in Gymea and -0.9% in Kurrajong Hills (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Gymea, while Kurrajong Hills went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Gymea and 7.6% in Kurrajong Hills, so landlords in Gymea face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Gymea is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,219 against 705, roughly 12 times the size of Kurrajong Hills; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Gymea for a lower purchase price, Gymea for recent price momentum, Gymea for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison