Skip to main content

Hackney vs Lockleys

Property investment comparison - Hackney, SA 5069 vs Lockleys, SA 5032

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Hackney wins 0, Lockleys wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricHackneyLockleys
Median house price$1.6M$1.5M
Median unit price$1.4M$610K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.51%2.60%
Gross rental yield (units)--
1-year house growth-+10.8%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.1%0.7%
Population5755,987

Hackney vs Lockleys: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.6M in Hackney and $1.5M in Lockleys, so Lockleys is the cheaper entry point, with Hackney houses about 4% dearer.

For units, Hackney sits at a median of $1.4M against $610K in Lockleys, which makes Lockleys the more affordable unit market and Hackney the pricier one.

On cash flow, Lockleys leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.60%, compared with 2.51% in Hackney, a gap of 0.09 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Lockleys and 1.1% in Hackney, so landlords in Lockleys face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Lockleys is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,987 against 575, roughly 10 times the size of Hackney; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Lockleys for rental income, Lockleys for a lower purchase price, Lockleys for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison