Hallsville vs Highfields
Property investment comparison - Hallsville, NSW 2340 vs Highfields, NSW 2289
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Hallsville wins 4, Highfields wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Hallsville | Highfields |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.0M | $1.0M |
| Median unit price | $370K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.83% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 6.94% | 4.37% |
| 1-year house growth | +14.9% | +1.1% |
| 3-year house growth | +33.2% | +27.5% |
| Vacancy rate | 2.0% | 3.4% |
| Population | 642 | 936 |
Hallsville vs Highfields: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.0M in Hallsville and $1.0M in Highfields, so Highfields is the cheaper entry point.
Over the past year house prices moved +14.9% in Hallsville and +1.1% in Highfields, so recent momentum favours Hallsville, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Looking back three years, Hallsville houses are +33.2% and Highfields houses +27.5%, so Hallsville has compounded faster than Highfields over the longer window.
Rental vacancy is 2.0% in Hallsville and 3.4% in Highfields, so landlords in Hallsville face less competition for tenants.
Highfields is the bigger suburb, with a population of 936 against 642, larger than Hallsville; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Highfields for a lower purchase price, Hallsville for recent price momentum, Hallsville for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison