Hamersley vs Innaloo
Property investment comparison - Hamersley, WA 6022 vs Innaloo, WA 6018
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Hamersley wins 2, Innaloo wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Hamersley | Innaloo |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.1M | $1.1M |
| Median unit price | $815K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.79% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 1.70% | 5.10% |
| 1-year house growth | +13.7%estimate | +17.5%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.6% | 1.0% |
| Population | 5,209 | 9,592 |
Hamersley vs Innaloo: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.1M in Hamersley and $1.1M in Innaloo, so Hamersley is the cheaper entry point.
Over the past year house prices moved +13.7% in Hamersley (an estimate) and +17.5% in Innaloo (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Innaloo, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Hamersley and 1.0% in Innaloo, so landlords in Hamersley face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Innaloo is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,592 against 5,209, larger than Hamersley; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Hamersley for a lower purchase price, Innaloo for recent price momentum, Hamersley for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison