Skip to main content

Hamilton Valley vs Maclean

Property investment comparison - Hamilton Valley, NSW 2641 vs Maclean, NSW 2463

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Hamilton Valley wins 2, Maclean wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricHamilton ValleyMaclean
Median house price$670K$680K
Median unit price-$440K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.24%4.28%
Gross rental yield (units)3.55%5.50%
1-year house growth+11.3%estimate+5.3%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate2.4%0.7%
Population8342,778

Hamilton Valley vs Maclean: what the numbers say

The median house price is $670K in Hamilton Valley and $680K in Maclean, so Hamilton Valley is the cheaper entry point, with Maclean houses about 1% dearer.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 4.24% in Hamilton Valley and 4.28% in Maclean, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +11.3% in Hamilton Valley (an estimate) and +5.3% in Maclean (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Hamilton Valley, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Maclean and 2.4% in Hamilton Valley, so landlords in Maclean face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Maclean is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,778 against 834, roughly 3.3 times the size of Hamilton Valley; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Hamilton Valley for a lower purchase price, Hamilton Valley for recent price momentum, Maclean for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison