Skip to main content

Hamilton Valley vs Swan Bay

Property investment comparison - Hamilton Valley, NSW 2641 vs Swan Bay, NSW 2471

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Hamilton Valley wins 1, Swan Bay wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricHamilton ValleySwan Bay
Median house price$670K$670K
Median unit price-$165K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.24%-
Gross rental yield (units)3.55%8.18%
1-year house growth+11.3%estimate+10.3%
3-year house growth-+68.4%
Vacancy rate2.4%1.5%
Population834357

Hamilton Valley vs Swan Bay: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $670K in Hamilton Valley and $670K in Swan Bay.

Over the past year house prices moved +11.3% in Hamilton Valley (an estimate) and +10.3% in Swan Bay, so recent momentum favours Hamilton Valley, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Swan Bay and 2.4% in Hamilton Valley, so landlords in Swan Bay face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Hamilton Valley is the bigger suburb, with a population of 834 against 357, roughly 2.3 times the size of Swan Bay; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Hamilton Valley for recent price momentum, Swan Bay for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison
Hamilton Valley vs Swan Bay: Suburb Comparison 2026