Skip to main content

Hamilton Valley vs Turondale

Property investment comparison - Hamilton Valley, NSW 2641 vs Turondale, NSW 2795

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Hamilton Valley wins 0, Turondale wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricHamilton ValleyTurondale
Median house price$670K$670K
Median unit price-$445K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.24%4.50%
Gross rental yield (units)3.55%5.35%
1-year house growth+11.3%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate2.4%0.7%
Population834103

Hamilton Valley vs Turondale: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $670K in Hamilton Valley and $670K in Turondale.

On cash flow, Turondale leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.50%, compared with 4.24% in Hamilton Valley, a gap of 0.26 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Turondale and 2.4% in Hamilton Valley, so landlords in Turondale face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Hamilton Valley is the bigger suburb, with a population of 834 against 103, roughly 8 times the size of Turondale; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Turondale for rental income, Turondale for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison