Skip to main content

Hamilton vs Happy Valley

Property investment comparison - Hamilton, VIC 3300 vs Happy Valley, VIC 3351

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Hamilton wins 2, Happy Valley wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricHamiltonHappy Valley
Median house price$440K$445K
Median unit price$325K$50K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.76%6.60%
Gross rental yield (units)5.53%8.05%
1-year house growth+10.6%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate0.3%2.7%
Population10,346162

Hamilton vs Happy Valley: what the numbers say

The median house price is $440K in Hamilton and $445K in Happy Valley, so Hamilton is the cheaper entry point, with Happy Valley houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Hamilton sits at a median of $325K against $50K in Happy Valley, which makes Happy Valley the more affordable unit market and Hamilton the pricier one.

On cash flow, Happy Valley leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 6.60%, compared with 4.76% in Hamilton, a gap of 1.84 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Hamilton and 2.7% in Happy Valley, so landlords in Hamilton face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Hamilton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,346 against 162, roughly 64 times the size of Happy Valley; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Happy Valley for rental income, Hamilton for a lower purchase price, Hamilton for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison