Skip to main content

Hamilton vs Koroop

Property investment comparison - Hamilton, VIC 3300 vs Koroop, VIC 3579

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Hamilton wins 2, Koroop wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricHamiltonKoroop
Median house price$440K$435K
Median unit price$325K$215K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.76%4.33%
Gross rental yield (units)5.53%5.55%
1-year house growth+10.6%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate0.3%0.8%
Population10,34663

Hamilton vs Koroop: what the numbers say

The median house price is $440K in Hamilton and $435K in Koroop, so Koroop is the cheaper entry point, with Hamilton houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Hamilton sits at a median of $325K against $215K in Koroop, which makes Koroop the more affordable unit market and Hamilton the pricier one.

On cash flow, Hamilton leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.76%, compared with 4.33% in Koroop, a gap of 0.43 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Hamilton and 0.8% in Koroop, so landlords in Hamilton face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Hamilton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,346 against 63, roughly 164 times the size of Koroop; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Hamilton for rental income, Koroop for a lower purchase price, Hamilton for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison