Skip to main content

Hamilton vs Murchison

Property investment comparison - Hamilton, VIC 3300 vs Murchison, VIC 3610

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Hamilton wins 2, Murchison wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricHamiltonMurchison
Median house price$440K$425K
Median unit price$325K-
Gross rental yield (houses)4.76%5.29%
Gross rental yield (units)5.53%7.79%
1-year house growth+10.6%estimate+7.7%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate0.3%3.7%
Population10,346884

Hamilton vs Murchison: what the numbers say

The median house price is $440K in Hamilton and $425K in Murchison, so Murchison is the cheaper entry point, with Hamilton houses about 4% dearer.

On cash flow, Murchison leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.29%, compared with 4.76% in Hamilton, a gap of 0.53 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.6% in Hamilton (an estimate) and +7.7% in Murchison (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Hamilton, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Hamilton and 3.7% in Murchison, so landlords in Hamilton face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Hamilton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,346 against 884, roughly 12 times the size of Murchison; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Murchison for rental income, Murchison for a lower purchase price, Hamilton for recent price momentum, Hamilton for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison