Skip to main content

Hamilton vs Nelson

Property investment comparison - Hamilton, VIC 3300 vs Nelson, VIC 3292

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Hamilton wins 2, Nelson wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricHamiltonNelson
Median house price$440K$445K
Median unit price$325K$165K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.76%-
Gross rental yield (units)5.53%-
1-year house growth+10.6%estimate+18.3%
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate0.3%1.5%
Population10,346191

Hamilton vs Nelson: what the numbers say

The median house price is $440K in Hamilton and $445K in Nelson, so Hamilton is the cheaper entry point, with Nelson houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Hamilton sits at a median of $325K against $165K in Nelson, which makes Nelson the more affordable unit market and Hamilton the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.6% in Hamilton (an estimate) and +18.3% in Nelson, so recent momentum favours Nelson, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Hamilton and 1.5% in Nelson, so landlords in Hamilton face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Hamilton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,346 against 191, roughly 54 times the size of Nelson; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Hamilton for a lower purchase price, Nelson for recent price momentum, Hamilton for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison