Hamilton vs Stonyford
Property investment comparison - Hamilton, VIC 3300 vs Stonyford, VIC 3260
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Hamilton wins 1, Stonyford wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Hamilton | Stonyford |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $440K | $435K |
| Median unit price | $325K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.76% | 6.48% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.53% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +10.6%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.3% | 0.4% |
| Population | 10,346 | 65 |
Hamilton vs Stonyford: what the numbers say
The median house price is $440K in Hamilton and $435K in Stonyford, so Stonyford is the cheaper entry point, with Hamilton houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Stonyford leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 6.48%, compared with 4.76% in Hamilton, a gap of 1.72 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Hamilton and 0.4% in Stonyford, so landlords in Hamilton face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Hamilton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,346 against 65, roughly 159 times the size of Stonyford; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Stonyford for rental income, Stonyford for a lower purchase price, Hamilton for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison