Hamilton vs Youanmite
Property investment comparison - Hamilton, VIC 3300 vs Youanmite, VIC 3646
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Hamilton wins 1, Youanmite wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Hamilton | Youanmite |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $440K | $440K |
| Median unit price | $325K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.76% | 4.77% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.53% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +10.6%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.3% | 3.9% |
| Population | 10,346 | 56 |
Hamilton vs Youanmite: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $440K in Hamilton and $440K in Youanmite.
Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 4.76% in Hamilton and 4.77% in Youanmite, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.
Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Hamilton and 3.9% in Youanmite, so landlords in Hamilton face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Hamilton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,346 against 56, roughly 185 times the size of Youanmite; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Hamilton for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison