Skip to main content

Hamlyn Terrace vs Thirlmere

Property investment comparison - Hamlyn Terrace, NSW 2259 vs Thirlmere, NSW 2572

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Hamlyn Terrace wins 2, Thirlmere wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricHamlyn TerraceThirlmere
Median house price$1.0M$1.0M
Median unit price$695K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.94%3.38%
Gross rental yield (units)--
1-year house growth+9.3%+10.9%estimate
3-year house growth+15.6%-
Vacancy rate1.4%2.2%
Population8,7614,986

Hamlyn Terrace vs Thirlmere: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.0M in Hamlyn Terrace and $1.0M in Thirlmere, so Thirlmere is the cheaper entry point.

On cash flow, Hamlyn Terrace leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.94%, compared with 3.38% in Thirlmere, a gap of 0.56 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +9.3% in Hamlyn Terrace and +10.9% in Thirlmere (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Thirlmere, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Hamlyn Terrace and 2.2% in Thirlmere, so landlords in Hamlyn Terrace face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Hamlyn Terrace is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,761 against 4,986, larger than Thirlmere; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Hamlyn Terrace for rental income, Thirlmere for a lower purchase price, Thirlmere for recent price momentum, Hamlyn Terrace for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison