Skip to main content

Hampshire vs Primrose Sands

Property investment comparison - Hampshire, TAS 7321 vs Primrose Sands, TAS 7173

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Hampshire wins 3, Primrose Sands wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricHampshirePrimrose Sands
Median house price$520K$525K
Median unit price-$500K
Gross rental yield (houses)5.43%4.40%
Gross rental yield (units)-2.68%
1-year house growth-+12.6%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.8%2.2%
Population541,209

Hampshire vs Primrose Sands: what the numbers say

The median house price is $520K in Hampshire and $525K in Primrose Sands, so Hampshire is the cheaper entry point, with Primrose Sands houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Hampshire leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.43%, compared with 4.40% in Primrose Sands, a gap of 1.03 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.8% in Hampshire and 2.2% in Primrose Sands, so landlords in Hampshire face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Primrose Sands is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,209 against 54, roughly 22 times the size of Hampshire; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Hampshire for rental income, Hampshire for a lower purchase price, Hampshire for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison