Hampton Park vs Mockinya
Property investment comparison - Hampton Park, VIC 3976 vs Mockinya, VIC 3401
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Hampton Park wins 1, Mockinya wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Hampton Park | Mockinya |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $730K | $730K |
| Median unit price | $590K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.04% | 2.79% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.59% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +8.9%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.3% | - |
| Population | 26,082 | 30 |
Hampton Park vs Mockinya: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $730K in Hampton Park and $730K in Mockinya.
On cash flow, Hampton Park leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.04%, compared with 2.79% in Mockinya, a gap of 1.25 percentage points.
Hampton Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 26,082 against 30, roughly 869 times the size of Mockinya; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Hampton Park for rental income. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison