Skip to main content

Hampton Park vs Sandy Point

Property investment comparison - Hampton Park, VIC 3976 vs Sandy Point, VIC 3959

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Hampton Park wins 3, Sandy Point wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricHampton ParkSandy Point
Median house price$730K$725K
Median unit price$590K$500K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.04%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.59%4.31%
1-year house growth+8.9%estimate-5.4%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate2.3%11.1%
Population26,082312

Hampton Park vs Sandy Point: what the numbers say

The median house price is $730K in Hampton Park and $725K in Sandy Point, so Sandy Point is the cheaper entry point, with Hampton Park houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Hampton Park sits at a median of $590K against $500K in Sandy Point, which makes Sandy Point the more affordable unit market and Hampton Park the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +8.9% in Hampton Park (an estimate) and -5.4% in Sandy Point (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Hampton Park, while Sandy Point went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 2.3% in Hampton Park and 11.1% in Sandy Point, so landlords in Hampton Park face less competition for tenants.

Hampton Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 26,082 against 312, roughly 84 times the size of Sandy Point; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Sandy Point for a lower purchase price, Hampton Park for recent price momentum, Hampton Park for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison