Skip to main content

Hampton vs Kew

Property investment comparison - Hampton, VIC 3188 vs Kew, VIC 3101

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Hampton wins 3, Kew wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricHamptonKew
Median house price$2.5M$2.5M
Median unit price$1.2M$850K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.76%2.35%
Gross rental yield (units)-4.05%
1-year house growth+0.1%estimate-3.4%
3-year house growth--9.3%
Vacancy rate1.6%1.6%
Population13,51824,499

Hampton vs Kew: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.5M in Hampton and $2.5M in Kew, so Hampton is the cheaper entry point, with Kew houses about 4% dearer.

For units, Hampton sits at a median of $1.2M against $850K in Kew, which makes Kew the more affordable unit market and Hampton the pricier one.

On cash flow, Hampton leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.76%, compared with 2.35% in Kew, a gap of 0.41 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +0.1% in Hampton (an estimate) and -3.4% in Kew, so recent momentum favours Hampton, while Kew went backwards.

Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 1.6%.

Kew is the bigger suburb, with a population of 24,499 against 13,518, larger than Hampton; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Hampton for rental income, Hampton for a lower purchase price, Hampton for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison