Harlaxton vs The Range
Property investment comparison - Harlaxton, QLD 4350 vs The Range, QLD 4700
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Harlaxton wins 2, The Range wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Harlaxton | The Range |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $700K | $700K |
| Median unit price | $560K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.00% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.69% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +19.7% | +12.2%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | +67.8% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.5% | 2.7% |
| Population | 2,824 | 5,231 |
Harlaxton vs The Range: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $700K in Harlaxton and $700K in The Range.
Over the past year house prices moved +19.7% in Harlaxton and +12.2% in The Range (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Harlaxton, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Harlaxton and 2.7% in The Range, so landlords in Harlaxton face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
The Range is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,231 against 2,824, larger than Harlaxton; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Harlaxton for recent price momentum, Harlaxton for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison