Hassall Grove vs Lalor Park
Property investment comparison - Hassall Grove, NSW 2761 vs Lalor Park, NSW 2147
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Hassall Grove wins 1, Lalor Park wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Hassall Grove | Lalor Park |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.1M | $1.1M |
| Median unit price | - | $680K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 2.82% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.01% | 3.57% |
| 1-year house growth | +8.9%estimate | +7.0% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +15.2% |
| Vacancy rate | 2.1% | 1.4% |
| Population | 4,401 | 7,834 |
Hassall Grove vs Lalor Park: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Hassall Grove and $1.1M in Lalor Park.
Over the past year house prices moved +8.9% in Hassall Grove (an estimate) and +7.0% in Lalor Park, so recent momentum favours Hassall Grove, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Lalor Park and 2.1% in Hassall Grove, so landlords in Lalor Park face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Lalor Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,834 against 4,401, larger than Hassall Grove; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Hassall Grove for recent price momentum, Lalor Park for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison