Hastings vs Laceby
Property investment comparison - Hastings, VIC 3915 vs Laceby, VIC 3678
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Hastings wins 2, Laceby wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Hastings | Laceby |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $730K | $730K |
| Median unit price | $590K | $480K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.13% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.70% | 2.81% |
| 1-year house growth | +5.7% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +2.2% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.5% | 2.0% |
| Population | 10,369 | 304 |
Hastings vs Laceby: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $730K in Hastings and $730K in Laceby.
For units, Hastings sits at a median of $590K against $480K in Laceby, which makes Laceby the more affordable unit market and Hastings the pricier one.
Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Hastings and 2.0% in Laceby, so landlords in Hastings face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Hastings is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,369 against 304, roughly 34 times the size of Laceby; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Hastings for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison