Skip to main content

Hastings vs Lara

Property investment comparison - Hastings, VIC 3915 vs Lara, VIC 3212

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Hastings wins 2, Lara wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricHastingsLara
Median house price$730K$730K
Median unit price$590K$560K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.13%4.10%
Gross rental yield (units)4.70%4.70%
1-year house growth+5.7%+6.8%estimate
3-year house growth+2.2%-
Vacancy rate0.5%1.7%
Population10,36919,014

Hastings vs Lara: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $730K in Hastings and $730K in Lara.

For units, Hastings sits at a median of $590K against $560K in Lara, which makes Lara the more affordable unit market and Hastings the pricier one.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 4.13% in Hastings and 4.10% in Lara, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +5.7% in Hastings and +6.8% in Lara (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Lara, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Hastings and 1.7% in Lara, so landlords in Hastings face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Lara is the bigger suburb, with a population of 19,014 against 10,369, larger than Hastings; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Lara for recent price momentum, Hastings for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison
Hastings vs Lara: Property Investment Comparison (2026)