Hastings vs Mockinya
Property investment comparison - Hastings, VIC 3915 vs Mockinya, VIC 3401
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Hastings wins 1, Mockinya wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Hastings | Mockinya |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $730K | $730K |
| Median unit price | $590K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.13% | 2.79% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.70% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +5.7% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +2.2% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.5% | - |
| Population | 10,369 | 30 |
Hastings vs Mockinya: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $730K in Hastings and $730K in Mockinya.
On cash flow, Hastings leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.13%, compared with 2.79% in Mockinya, a gap of 1.34 percentage points.
Hastings is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,369 against 30, roughly 346 times the size of Mockinya; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Hastings for rental income. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison