Havelock vs St Albans Park
Property investment comparison - Havelock, VIC 3465 vs St Albans Park, VIC 3219
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Havelock wins 2, St Albans Park wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Havelock | St Albans Park |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $695K | $700K |
| Median unit price | - | $490K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 3.89% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.20% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +13.1% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +19.8% |
| Vacancy rate | 0.1% | 0.9% |
| Population | 83 | 4,942 |
Havelock vs St Albans Park: what the numbers say
The median house price is $695K in Havelock and $700K in St Albans Park, so Havelock is the cheaper entry point, with St Albans Park houses about 1% dearer.
Rental vacancy is 0.1% in Havelock and 0.9% in St Albans Park, so landlords in Havelock face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
St Albans Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,942 against 83, roughly 60 times the size of Havelock; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Havelock for a lower purchase price, Havelock for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Full profile
St Albans Park, VIC 3219
Open St Albans Park suburb profileRecent sales in St Albans Park
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison