Havelock vs Warragul
Property investment comparison - Havelock, VIC 3465 vs Warragul, VIC 3820
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Havelock wins 1, Warragul wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Havelock | Warragul |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $695K | $695K |
| Median unit price | - | $450K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 4.50% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.80% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +8.1% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +4.7% |
| Vacancy rate | 0.1% | 1.9% |
| Population | 83 | 19,856 |
Havelock vs Warragul: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $695K in Havelock and $695K in Warragul.
Rental vacancy is 0.1% in Havelock and 1.9% in Warragul, so landlords in Havelock face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Warragul is the bigger suburb, with a population of 19,856 against 83, roughly 239 times the size of Havelock; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Havelock for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison