Hazelmere vs Lake Coogee
Property investment comparison - Hazelmere, WA 6055 vs Lake Coogee, WA 6166
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Hazelmere wins 1, Lake Coogee wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Hazelmere | Lake Coogee |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.1M | $1.1M |
| Median unit price | $630K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.90% | 3.70% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.96% | 5.45% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +16.0% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +51.7% |
| Vacancy rate | 0.7% | 0.5% |
| Population | 935 | 4,768 |
Hazelmere vs Lake Coogee: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Hazelmere and $1.1M in Lake Coogee.
On cash flow, Hazelmere leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.90%, compared with 3.70% in Lake Coogee, a gap of 0.20 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Lake Coogee and 0.7% in Hazelmere, so landlords in Lake Coogee face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Lake Coogee is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,768 against 935, roughly 5 times the size of Hazelmere; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Hazelmere for rental income, Lake Coogee for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison