Skip to main content

Hazelmere vs Leschenault

Property investment comparison - Hazelmere, WA 6055 vs Leschenault, WA 6233

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Hazelmere wins 2, Leschenault wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricHazelmereLeschenault
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$630K$205K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.90%3.60%
Gross rental yield (units)4.96%8.31%
1-year house growth-+19.6%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate0.7%1.4%
Population9353,058

Hazelmere vs Leschenault: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Hazelmere and $1.1M in Leschenault, so Leschenault is the cheaper entry point, with Hazelmere houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Hazelmere sits at a median of $630K against $205K in Leschenault, which makes Leschenault the more affordable unit market and Hazelmere the pricier one.

On cash flow, Hazelmere leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.90%, compared with 3.60% in Leschenault, a gap of 0.30 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Hazelmere and 1.4% in Leschenault, so landlords in Hazelmere face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Leschenault is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,058 against 935, roughly 3.3 times the size of Hazelmere; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Hazelmere for rental income, Leschenault for a lower purchase price, Hazelmere for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison