Skip to main content

Heathcote vs Parklea

Property investment comparison - Heathcote, NSW 2233 vs Parklea, NSW 2768

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Heathcote wins 4, Parklea wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricHeathcoteParklea
Median house price$1.5M$1.5M
Median unit price$1.2M$690K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.03%
Gross rental yield (units)-4.95%
1-year house growth+5.3%+3.7%
3-year house growth+16.6%+5.6%
Vacancy rate0.7%1.8%
Population6,1483,684

Heathcote vs Parklea: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.5M in Heathcote and $1.5M in Parklea, so Heathcote is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Heathcote sits at a median of $1.2M against $690K in Parklea, which makes Parklea the more affordable unit market and Heathcote the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +5.3% in Heathcote and +3.7% in Parklea, so recent momentum favours Heathcote, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Heathcote houses are +16.6% and Parklea houses +5.6%, so Heathcote has compounded faster than Parklea over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Heathcote and 1.8% in Parklea, so landlords in Heathcote face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Heathcote is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,148 against 3,684, larger than Parklea; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Heathcote for a lower purchase price, Heathcote for recent price momentum, Heathcote for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison