Skip to main content

Heathfield vs Nailsworth

Property investment comparison - Heathfield, SA 5153 vs Nailsworth, SA 5083

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Heathfield wins 1, Nailsworth wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricHeathfieldNailsworth
Median house price$1.4M$1.4M
Median unit price$680K$650K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.60%2.44%
Gross rental yield (units)3.15%4.40%
1-year house growth-+9.2%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate3.9%1.9%
Population1,0622,235

Heathfield vs Nailsworth: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.4M in Heathfield and $1.4M in Nailsworth, so Nailsworth is the cheaper entry point, with Heathfield houses about 2% dearer.

For units, Heathfield sits at a median of $680K against $650K in Nailsworth, which makes Nailsworth the more affordable unit market and Heathfield the pricier one.

On cash flow, Heathfield leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.60%, compared with 2.44% in Nailsworth, a gap of 0.16 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.9% in Nailsworth and 3.9% in Heathfield, so landlords in Nailsworth face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Nailsworth is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,235 against 1,062, roughly 2.1 times the size of Heathfield; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Heathfield for rental income, Nailsworth for a lower purchase price, Nailsworth for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison