Skip to main content

Heathwood vs Rifle Range

Property investment comparison - Heathwood, QLD 4110 vs Rifle Range, QLD 4311

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Heathwood wins 2, Rifle Range wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricHeathwoodRifle Range
Median house price$1.2M$1.2M
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)-2.73%
Gross rental yield (units)4.15%-
1-year house growth+18.1%estimate+16.0%
3-year house growth-+61.6%
Vacancy rate1.7%8.5%
Population4,944197

Heathwood vs Rifle Range: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.2M in Heathwood and $1.2M in Rifle Range, so Rifle Range is the cheaper entry point, with Heathwood houses about 1% dearer.

Over the past year house prices moved +18.1% in Heathwood (an estimate) and +16.0% in Rifle Range, so recent momentum favours Heathwood, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.7% in Heathwood and 8.5% in Rifle Range, so landlords in Heathwood face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Heathwood is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,944 against 197, roughly 25 times the size of Rifle Range; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Rifle Range for a lower purchase price, Heathwood for recent price momentum, Heathwood for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison