Heathwood vs Tingalpa
Property investment comparison - Heathwood, QLD 4110 vs Tingalpa, QLD 4173
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Heathwood wins 1, Tingalpa wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Heathwood | Tingalpa |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.2M | $1.2M |
| Median unit price | - | $815K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 3.30% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.15% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +18.1%estimate | +12.8%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.7% | 1.0% |
| Population | 4,944 | 8,461 |
Heathwood vs Tingalpa: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.2M in Heathwood and $1.2M in Tingalpa, so Tingalpa is the cheaper entry point.
Over the past year house prices moved +18.1% in Heathwood (an estimate) and +12.8% in Tingalpa (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Heathwood, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Tingalpa and 1.7% in Heathwood, so landlords in Tingalpa face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Tingalpa is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,461 against 4,944, larger than Heathwood; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Tingalpa for a lower purchase price, Heathwood for recent price momentum, Tingalpa for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison