Skip to main content

Heritage Park vs Wondunna

Property investment comparison - Heritage Park, QLD 4118 vs Wondunna, QLD 4655

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Heritage Park wins 3, Wondunna wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricHeritage ParkWondunna
Median house price$1.0M$1.0M
Median unit price$810K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.80%3.61%
Gross rental yield (units)3.56%-
1-year house growth+16.8%+14.8%estimate
3-year house growth+38.9%-
Vacancy rate1.0%6.0%
Population4,9303,315

Heritage Park vs Wondunna: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.0M in Heritage Park and $1.0M in Wondunna.

On cash flow, Heritage Park leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.80%, compared with 3.61% in Wondunna, a gap of 0.19 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +16.8% in Heritage Park and +14.8% in Wondunna (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Heritage Park, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Heritage Park and 6.0% in Wondunna, so landlords in Heritage Park face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Heritage Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,930 against 3,315, larger than Wondunna; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Heritage Park for rental income, Heritage Park for recent price momentum, Heritage Park for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison