Skip to main content

Hermit Park vs Julago

Property investment comparison - Hermit Park, QLD 4812 vs Julago, QLD 4816

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Hermit Park wins 4, Julago wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricHermit ParkJulago
Median house price$730K$730K
Median unit price$390K$465K
Gross rental yield (houses)-4.35%
Gross rental yield (units)5.60%2.70%
1-year house growth+17.5%+16.4%
3-year house growth+60.2%+60.3%
Vacancy rate1.1%2.1%
Population3,512384

Hermit Park vs Julago: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $730K in Hermit Park and $730K in Julago.

For units, Hermit Park sits at a median of $390K against $465K in Julago, which makes Hermit Park the more affordable unit market and Julago the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +17.5% in Hermit Park and +16.4% in Julago, so recent momentum favours Hermit Park, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Hermit Park houses are +60.2% and Julago houses +60.3%, so Julago has compounded faster than Hermit Park over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Hermit Park and 2.1% in Julago, so landlords in Hermit Park face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Hermit Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,512 against 384, roughly 9 times the size of Julago; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Hermit Park for recent price momentum, Hermit Park for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison