Skip to main content

Hermit Park vs Newtown

Property investment comparison - Hermit Park, QLD 4812 vs Newtown, QLD 4350

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Hermit Park wins 3, Newtown wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricHermit ParkNewtown
Median house price$730K$730K
Median unit price$390K$590K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.97%
Gross rental yield (units)5.60%4.18%
1-year house growth+17.5%+18.4%
3-year house growth+60.2%+60.0%
Vacancy rate1.1%0.9%
Population3,51210,039

Hermit Park vs Newtown: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $730K in Hermit Park and $730K in Newtown.

For units, Hermit Park sits at a median of $390K against $590K in Newtown, which makes Hermit Park the more affordable unit market and Newtown the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +17.5% in Hermit Park and +18.4% in Newtown, so recent momentum favours Newtown, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Hermit Park houses are +60.2% and Newtown houses +60.0%, so Hermit Park has compounded faster than Newtown over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Newtown and 1.1% in Hermit Park, so landlords in Newtown face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Newtown is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,039 against 3,512, roughly 2.9 times the size of Hermit Park; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Newtown for recent price momentum, Newtown for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison