Herne Hill vs Warrong
Property investment comparison - Herne Hill, VIC 3218 vs Warrong, VIC 3283
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Herne Hill wins 2, Warrong wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Herne Hill | Warrong |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $800K | $800K |
| Median unit price | $400K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.57% | 2.43% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.90% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +3.2% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +12.1% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.1% | 6.0% |
| Population | 3,507 | 77 |
Herne Hill vs Warrong: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $800K in Herne Hill and $800K in Warrong.
On cash flow, Herne Hill leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.57%, compared with 2.43% in Warrong, a gap of 1.14 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 2.1% in Herne Hill and 6.0% in Warrong, so landlords in Herne Hill face less competition for tenants.
Herne Hill is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,507 against 77, roughly 46 times the size of Warrong; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Herne Hill for rental income, Herne Hill for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison