Hexham vs Moruya Heads
Property investment comparison - Hexham, NSW 2322 vs Moruya Heads, NSW 2537
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Hexham wins 1, Moruya Heads wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Hexham | Moruya Heads |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $835K | $835K |
| Median unit price | $530K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.76% | 3.67% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 6.24% | 5.08% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +5.8% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +0.0% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.6% | 1.4% |
| Population | 157 | 1,125 |
Hexham vs Moruya Heads: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $835K in Hexham and $835K in Moruya Heads.
On cash flow, Moruya Heads leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.67%, compared with 2.76% in Hexham, a gap of 0.91 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Moruya Heads and 1.6% in Hexham, so landlords in Moruya Heads face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Moruya Heads is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,125 against 157, roughly 7 times the size of Hexham; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Moruya Heads for rental income, Moruya Heads for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison