Hexham vs Horsham
Property investment comparison - Hexham, VIC 3273 vs Horsham, VIC 3400
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Hexham wins 1, Horsham wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Hexham | Horsham |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $475K | $475K |
| Median unit price | $310K | $400K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.33% | 5.00% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.09% | 5.10% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +18.1% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +17.5% |
| Vacancy rate | - | 0.1% |
| Population | 130 | 15,134 |
Hexham vs Horsham: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $475K in Hexham and $475K in Horsham.
For units, Hexham sits at a median of $310K against $400K in Horsham, which makes Hexham the more affordable unit market and Horsham the pricier one.
On cash flow, Horsham leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.00%, compared with 3.33% in Hexham, a gap of 1.67 percentage points.
Horsham is the bigger suburb, with a population of 15,134 against 130, roughly 116 times the size of Hexham; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Horsham for rental income. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison