Hexham vs Mooroopna
Property investment comparison - Hexham, VIC 3273 vs Mooroopna, VIC 3629
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Hexham wins 2, Mooroopna wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Hexham | Mooroopna |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $475K | $485K |
| Median unit price | $310K | $315K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.33% | 5.00% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.09% | 5.65% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +12.8% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +23.2% |
| Vacancy rate | - | 1.2% |
| Population | 130 | 8,312 |
Hexham vs Mooroopna: what the numbers say
The median house price is $475K in Hexham and $485K in Mooroopna, so Hexham is the cheaper entry point, with Mooroopna houses about 2% dearer.
For units, Hexham sits at a median of $310K against $315K in Mooroopna, which makes Hexham the more affordable unit market and Mooroopna the pricier one.
On cash flow, Mooroopna leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.00%, compared with 3.33% in Hexham, a gap of 1.67 percentage points.
Mooroopna is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,312 against 130, roughly 64 times the size of Hexham; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Mooroopna for rental income, Hexham for a lower purchase price. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison