Skip to main content

Highett vs Rosanna

Property investment comparison - Highett, VIC 3190 vs Rosanna, VIC 3084

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Highett wins 6, Rosanna wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricHighettRosanna
Median house price$1.4M$1.4M
Median unit price$705K$815K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.21%2.40%
Gross rental yield (units)4.54%3.98%
1-year house growth-0.2%estimate-2.8%
3-year house growth-+11.7%
Vacancy rate1.4%1.6%
Population12,0168,616

Highett vs Rosanna: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.4M in Highett and $1.4M in Rosanna, so Highett is the cheaper entry point, with Rosanna houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Highett sits at a median of $705K against $815K in Rosanna, which makes Highett the more affordable unit market and Rosanna the pricier one.

On cash flow, Highett leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.21%, compared with 2.40% in Rosanna, a gap of 0.81 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved -0.2% in Highett (an estimate) and -2.8% in Rosanna, so recent momentum favours Highett, while Rosanna went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Highett and 1.6% in Rosanna, so landlords in Highett face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Highett is the bigger suburb, with a population of 12,016 against 8,616, larger than Rosanna; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Highett for rental income, Highett for a lower purchase price, Highett for recent price momentum, Highett for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison