Skip to main content

Highfields vs Woody Point

Property investment comparison - Highfields, QLD 4352 vs Woody Point, QLD 4019

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Highfields wins 4, Woody Point wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricHighfieldsWoody Point
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price-$925K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.39%3.00%
Gross rental yield (units)-3.34%
1-year house growth+15.5%+14.2%
3-year house growth+44.2%+47.8%
Vacancy rate0.3%1.6%
Population8,5684,548

Highfields vs Woody Point: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Highfields and $1.1M in Woody Point, so Highfields is the cheaper entry point, with Woody Point houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Highfields leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.39%, compared with 3.00% in Woody Point, a gap of 0.39 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +15.5% in Highfields and +14.2% in Woody Point, so recent momentum favours Highfields, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Highfields houses are +44.2% and Woody Point houses +47.8%, so Woody Point has compounded faster than Highfields over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Highfields and 1.6% in Woody Point, so landlords in Highfields face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Highfields is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,568 against 4,548, larger than Woody Point; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Highfields for rental income, Highfields for a lower purchase price, Highfields for recent price momentum, Highfields for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison