Skip to main content

Highlands vs Rushworth

Property investment comparison - Highlands, VIC 3660 vs Rushworth, VIC 3612

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Highlands wins 3, Rushworth wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricHighlandsRushworth
Median house price$385K$370K
Median unit price$350K$310K
Gross rental yield (houses)6.43%5.33%
Gross rental yield (units)5.62%3.09%
1-year house growth-+5.8%
3-year house growth--8.0%
Vacancy rate1.1%1.8%
Population1511,411

Highlands vs Rushworth: what the numbers say

The median house price is $385K in Highlands and $370K in Rushworth, so Rushworth is the cheaper entry point, with Highlands houses about 4% dearer.

For units, Highlands sits at a median of $350K against $310K in Rushworth, which makes Rushworth the more affordable unit market and Highlands the pricier one.

On cash flow, Highlands leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 6.43%, compared with 5.33% in Rushworth, a gap of 1.10 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Highlands and 1.8% in Rushworth, so landlords in Highlands face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Rushworth is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,411 against 151, roughly 9 times the size of Highlands; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Highlands for rental income, Rushworth for a lower purchase price, Highlands for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison