Hilldene vs Kealba
Property investment comparison - Hilldene, VIC 3660 vs Kealba, VIC 3021
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Hilldene wins 2, Kealba wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Hilldene | Kealba |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $770K | $775K |
| Median unit price | $495K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.25% | 3.70% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.81% | 4.70% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +7.3%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.0% | 1.3% |
| Population | 330 | 3,226 |
Hilldene vs Kealba: what the numbers say
The median house price is $770K in Hilldene and $775K in Kealba, so Hilldene is the cheaper entry point, with Kealba houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Kealba leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.70%, compared with 3.25% in Hilldene, a gap of 0.45 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Hilldene and 1.3% in Kealba, so landlords in Hilldene face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Kealba is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,226 against 330, roughly 10 times the size of Hilldene; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Kealba for rental income, Hilldene for a lower purchase price, Hilldene for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison