Skip to main content

Hilldene vs Killara

Property investment comparison - Hilldene, VIC 3660 vs Killara, VIC 3691

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Hilldene wins 2, Killara wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricHilldeneKillara
Median house price$770K$775K
Median unit price$495K$445K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.25%4.20%
Gross rental yield (units)3.81%4.06%
1-year house growth-+16.4%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.0%3.3%
Population3301,485

Hilldene vs Killara: what the numbers say

The median house price is $770K in Hilldene and $775K in Killara, so Hilldene is the cheaper entry point, with Killara houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Hilldene sits at a median of $495K against $445K in Killara, which makes Killara the more affordable unit market and Hilldene the pricier one.

On cash flow, Killara leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.20%, compared with 3.25% in Hilldene, a gap of 0.95 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Hilldene and 3.3% in Killara, so landlords in Hilldene face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Killara is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,485 against 330, roughly 4.5 times the size of Hilldene; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Killara for rental income, Hilldene for a lower purchase price, Hilldene for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison