Hillier vs Tanunda
Property investment comparison - Hillier, SA 5116 vs Tanunda, SA 5352
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Hillier wins 1, Tanunda wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Hillier | Tanunda |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $835K | $830K |
| Median unit price | - | $555K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.69% | 3.88% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.45% | 4.21% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +9.7% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +44.3% |
| Vacancy rate | 2.1% | 0.1% |
| Population | 814 | 4,710 |
Hillier vs Tanunda: what the numbers say
The median house price is $835K in Hillier and $830K in Tanunda, so Tanunda is the cheaper entry point, with Hillier houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Tanunda leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.88%, compared with 3.69% in Hillier, a gap of 0.19 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.1% in Tanunda and 2.1% in Hillier, so landlords in Tanunda face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Tanunda is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,710 against 814, roughly 6 times the size of Hillier; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Tanunda for rental income, Tanunda for a lower purchase price, Tanunda for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison