Hillsborough vs Horseshoe Bend
Property investment comparison - Hillsborough, NSW 2320 vs Horseshoe Bend, NSW 2320
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Hillsborough wins 2, Horseshoe Bend wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Hillsborough | Horseshoe Bend |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $740K | $740K |
| Median unit price | $525K | $525K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 3.63% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 6.36% | 5.77% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +8.3% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +17.8% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.8% | 2.8% |
| Population | 50 | 427 |
Hillsborough vs Horseshoe Bend: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $740K in Hillsborough and $740K in Horseshoe Bend.
Rental vacancy is 1.8% in Hillsborough and 2.8% in Horseshoe Bend, so landlords in Hillsborough face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Horseshoe Bend is the bigger suburb, with a population of 427 against 50, roughly 9 times the size of Hillsborough; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Hillsborough for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Full profile
Horseshoe Bend, NSW 2320
Open Horseshoe Bend suburb profileRecent sales in Horseshoe Bend
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison