Hilton vs Kingsley
Property investment comparison - Hilton, WA 6163 vs Kingsley, WA 6026
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Hilton wins 1, Kingsley wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Hilton | Kingsley |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.3M | $1.3M |
| Median unit price | - | $510K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.30% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.60% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +23.1%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.3% | 0.5% |
| Population | 4,323 | 13,204 |
Hilton vs Kingsley: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.3M in Hilton and $1.3M in Kingsley, so Kingsley is the cheaper entry point.
Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Hilton and 0.5% in Kingsley, so landlords in Hilton face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Kingsley is the bigger suburb, with a population of 13,204 against 4,323, roughly 3.1 times the size of Hilton; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Kingsley for a lower purchase price, Hilton for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison