Skip to main content

Hocking vs Jane Brook

Property investment comparison - Hocking, WA 6065 vs Jane Brook, WA 6056

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Hocking wins 2, Jane Brook wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricHockingJane Brook
Median house price$1M$1M
Median unit price$800K-
Gross rental yield (houses)4.11%4.22%
Gross rental yield (units)4.83%5.25%
1-year house growth+21.0%estimate+16.4%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.1%1.3%
Population6,9873,670

Hocking vs Jane Brook: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1M in Hocking and $1M in Jane Brook.

On cash flow, Jane Brook leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.22%, compared with 4.11% in Hocking, a gap of 0.11 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +21.0% in Hocking (an estimate) and +16.4% in Jane Brook (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Hocking, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Hocking and 1.3% in Jane Brook, so landlords in Hocking face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Hocking is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,987 against 3,670, larger than Jane Brook; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Jane Brook for rental income, Hocking for recent price momentum, Hocking for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison