Skip to main content

Holloways Beach vs Leichhardt

Property investment comparison - Holloways Beach, QLD 4878 vs Leichhardt, QLD 4305

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Holloways Beach wins 2, Leichhardt wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricHolloways BeachLeichhardt
Median house price$755K$755K
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)4.96%3.70%
Gross rental yield (units)-3.85%
1-year house growth+18.4%estimate+17.1%
3-year house growth-+79.6%
Vacancy rate1.5%0.8%
Population2,3984,471

Holloways Beach vs Leichhardt: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $755K in Holloways Beach and $755K in Leichhardt.

On cash flow, Holloways Beach leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.96%, compared with 3.70% in Leichhardt, a gap of 1.26 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +18.4% in Holloways Beach (an estimate) and +17.1% in Leichhardt, so recent momentum favours Holloways Beach, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Leichhardt and 1.5% in Holloways Beach, so landlords in Leichhardt face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Leichhardt is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,471 against 2,398, larger than Holloways Beach; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Holloways Beach for rental income, Holloways Beach for recent price momentum, Leichhardt for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison