Skip to main content

Homebush vs Malabar

Property investment comparison - Homebush, NSW 2140 vs Malabar, NSW 2036

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Homebush wins 5, Malabar wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricHomebushMalabar
Median house price$3.3M$3.3M
Median unit price$670K$905K
Gross rental yield (houses)1.42%2.90%
Gross rental yield (units)5.75%4.92%
1-year house growth+15.3%estimate-3.4%
3-year house growth--1.4%
Vacancy rate1.0%1.1%
Population11,6604,714

Homebush vs Malabar: what the numbers say

The median house price is $3.3M in Homebush and $3.3M in Malabar, so Homebush is the cheaper entry point, with Malabar houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Homebush sits at a median of $670K against $905K in Malabar, which makes Homebush the more affordable unit market and Malabar the pricier one.

On cash flow, Malabar leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.90%, compared with 1.42% in Homebush, a gap of 1.48 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +15.3% in Homebush (an estimate) and -3.4% in Malabar, so recent momentum favours Homebush, while Malabar went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Homebush and 1.1% in Malabar, so landlords in Homebush face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Homebush is the bigger suburb, with a population of 11,660 against 4,714, roughly 2.5 times the size of Malabar; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Malabar for rental income, Homebush for a lower purchase price, Homebush for recent price momentum, Homebush for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison