Horfield vs Merbein
Property investment comparison - Horfield, VIC 3567 vs Merbein, VIC 3505
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Horfield wins 1, Merbein wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Horfield | Merbein |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $430K | $435K |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 5.10% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 10.37% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +7.6%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.2% | 1.8% |
| Population | 93 | 2,770 |
Horfield vs Merbein: what the numbers say
The median house price is $430K in Horfield and $435K in Merbein, so Horfield is the cheaper entry point, with Merbein houses about 1% dearer.
Rental vacancy is 1.8% in Merbein and 2.2% in Horfield, so landlords in Merbein face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Merbein is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,770 against 93, roughly 30 times the size of Horfield; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Horfield for a lower purchase price, Merbein for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison